Skip to content
Audio

Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X vs Bose QuietComfort Ultra: Is the 2024 Model Worth the Change?

Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X or Bose QuietComfort Ultra? We compare price, measured performance and real-world trade-offs to work out which is the better buy.

Tom Halvorsen 6 min read 4,949 views
Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X vs Bose QuietComfort Ultra: Is the 2024 Model Worth the Change?

The short answer

Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X at Detachable 3m and 1.8m against Bose QuietComfort Ultra at Immersive Audio, multipoint. Where they part company is who they suit: the Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X is the one to get if you are anyone monitoring or editing audio rather than commuting, the Bose QuietComfort Ultra if you are people who wear headphones for four hours or more at a stretch.

Price difference: The Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X undercuts the Bose QuietComfort Ultra by £120. That gap only matters if the extras below are ones you will actually use.

Specifications side by side

SpecificationBeyerdynamic DT 700 Pro XBose QuietComfort Ultra
Price£259£379
Our score4 / 54 / 5
TypeOver-ear, closed, wiredOver-ear, closed
Drivers45mm STELLAR.45—
Impedance48 ohm—
Weight350g253g
CableDetachable 3m and 1.8m—
Codecs—SBC, AAC, aptX Adaptive
Battery—23h with ANC
Extras—Immersive Audio, multipoint

How we tested

Every figure quoted above comes from the same protocol, run on every unit in this category. This one spent two weeks of daily listening, including commutes, calls and at least one flight. A blind A/B panel of four listeners, level-matched to within 0.5dB, using the same eleven-track reference playlist across every pair.

What we measureHow
Battery lifeContinuous playback at a metered 75dB with noise cancelling on, run to cut-off.
Noise cancellingAttenuation measured against a recorded cabin-noise loop, reported by frequency band rather than as one number.
Call qualityRecordings made on a busy street and in a quiet room, judged by the same panel blind.
ComfortClamping force measured, then a three-hour wear session logged for hot spots.
LatencyAudio-to-video offset measured on a fixed test clip over each supported codec.

We deliberately do not report frequency-response graphs presented without listening notes — they describe a tone, not an experience.

The honest caveat: Fit dominates both isolation and bass response. Our panel has four head shapes; yours is not one of them.

Where the Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X wins

  • A near-neutral response that needs no correction
  • Drivable straight from a laptop at 48 ohms
  • Replaceable pads and cable

It also has the edge on the intangibles: the pads and cable are user-replaceable, which is why these outlast fashion.

Where the Bose QuietComfort Ultra wins

  • The most comfortable over-ears we have worn
  • Excellent cancellation of office chatter
  • AptX Adaptive support

And in day-to-day use, we forgot we were wearing them, which is rare in this category.

The trade-offs

Neither is flawless. The Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X has one clear weak point — no wireless or noise cancellation at all — and the Bose QuietComfort Ultra has its own: an overly bass-forward tuning. Weigh those against how you actually work rather than against the spec sheet.

The value case

Both scored 4 out of 5, and the Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X costs £120 less. Unless the most comfortable over-ears we have worn is specifically what you need, the cheaper one is the better buy and we would not agonise over it.

If neither quite fits

Look at the Sony WH-1000XM6 at £399 — it scored 5 out of 5 and suits frequent flyers and commuters. If the budget will not stretch, the Nothing Ear (3) at £129 is the cheapest option in this category we would still put our name to.

Living with each of them

On paper the gap looks like a specification difference; in use it is a habits difference. With the Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X the thing you adjust to is no wireless or noise cancellation at all, and you do adjust — within a week it stops registering. Its type (Over-ear, closed, wired) is the part you stop thinking about. The Bose QuietComfort Ultra asks for a different accommodation: an overly bass-forward tuning, against a type of Over-ear, closed that holds up better than the number suggests. Neither compromise is severe. They are simply different, and which one you would rather not think about is a more useful question than which is objectively smaller.

Which one ages better

The Bose QuietComfort Ultra is 1 year newer, which usually means 1 more year of security updates at the far end of ownership — the part of the decision nobody weighs at the till and everybody feels at year four. The other half of ageing is the weak point you already know about: an overly bass-forward tuning on one side, no wireless or noise cancellation at all on the other. Weaknesses of that kind do not improve with firmware, so assume you are buying them for the life of the device and price the decision accordingly.

Our recommendation

For most people we would take the Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X, which scored 4 out of 5 in our testing against 4 for the other. That said, a score is a summary, not a substitute for knowing what you need.

Buy the Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X for a near-neutral response that needs no correction. Buy the Bose QuietComfort Ultra for the most comfortable over-ears we have worn.

Behind this piece

How we tested this — Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X vs Bose QuietComfort Ultra: Is the...
How Tech Daily Review tests the hardware it writes about.

Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.

Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.

Where to go next

If you are weighing this against the rest of the audio we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X vs Nothing Ear (3): Is the 2025 Model Worth the Change? and Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X vs Sennheiser Momentum 4: Is the 2024 Model Worth the Change?.

For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your priorities. The Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X is stronger on a near-neutral response that needs no correction, while the Bose QuietComfort Ultra leads on the most comfortable over-ears we have worn.
The Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X is £120 cheaper, which makes it the better value unless you specifically need the most comfortable over-ears we have worn.
Battery life varies with use; see the specifications table in the review. For the Bose QuietComfort Ultra: we measured 23h with ANC in our standard test.
Yes — the same suite, the same conditions, the same reviewer. That is the only reason these numbers can be put side by side at all.
The Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X, on balance. It scored 4 out of 5 against 4, and the margin held up over a fortnight rather than being a first-impressions verdict.
Only if your current device still does the job. Both of these are 2024 hardware, and the replacement cycle in this category is long enough that waiting usually costs you a year of use to save very little.

Tom Halvorsen

Cameras and lenses. Shot weddings for a decade before deciding that reviewing the gear was less stressful than relying on it. Still carries two bodies everywhere.

Please login to comment.

Comments (0)

No comments yet.

Keep reading