Dell UltraSharp U2724DE vs BenQ PD2706U: Same Money, Different Priorities
Dell UltraSharp U2724DE or BenQ PD2706U? We compare price, measured performance and real-world trade-offs to work out which is the better buy.
Daniel Reyes
The short answer
Dell UltraSharp U2724DE 1.4 out of the box, BenQ PD2706U 1.5 out of the box — the same test, run the same way. Where they part company is who they suit: the Dell UltraSharp U2724DE is the one to get if you are anyone working from a laptop who wants one cable on the desk, the BenQ PD2706U if you are designers who need colour accuracy without paying reference prices.
Price difference: Both sit at £549, so this decision comes down entirely to priorities rather than budget.
Specifications side by side
| Specification | Dell UltraSharp U2724DE | BenQ PD2706U |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £549 | £549 |
| Our score | 5 / 5 | 4 / 5 |
| Panel | 27in IPS Black, 2560x1440 | 27in IPS, 3840x2160 |
| Refresh | 120Hz | 60Hz |
| Brightness | 350 nits | 350 nits |
| Contrast | 2000:1 | 1200:1 |
| Ports | Thunderbolt 4 90W, DP, HDMI, 5x USB | USB-C 90W, 2x HDMI, DP |
| Coverage | 98% sRGB, 88% DCI-P3 | 95% DCI-P3, 100% sRGB |
| Delta E | 1.4 out of the box | 1.5 out of the box |
How we tested
Every figure quoted above comes from the same protocol, run on every unit in this category. This one spent two weeks as the reviewer’s primary display, driven by both a laptop and a desktop. A calibrated X-Rite i1Display Pro, measurements taken after a thirty-minute warm-up in a room held at 120 lux.
| What we measure | How |
|---|---|
| Colour accuracy | Delta E across 24 ColorChecker patches, out of the box with no calibration, because that is how most panels are used. |
| Brightness uniformity | Nine-point grid, reported as the worst deviation from centre rather than the average. |
| Contrast | Full-screen black and white measured in a darkened room, with local dimming disabled. |
| Power delivery | A 16in laptop under sustained load, checking whether the panel holds charge or loses ground. |
| Text rendering | Subpixel inspection at 200% magnification, which is where OLED fringing shows. |
We deliberately do not report quoted contrast ratios that rely on local dimming, and any HDR400 badge.
The honest caveat: Panel lottery is real. Backlight bleed on our unit may not match yours.
Where the Dell UltraSharp U2724DE wins
- IPS Black doubles the contrast of a normal IPS without OLED burn-in risk
- 90W Thunderbolt means one cable for power, video and a five-port hub
- The most accurate panel we have measured without calibration
It also has the edge on the intangibles: it charged a 16in MacBook Pro while driving the panel with no drop.
Where the BenQ PD2706U wins
- Factory calibrated with a printed report in the box
- The puck controller is the best monitor input method anyone ships
- 90W charging over one cable
And in day-to-day use, our unit measured Delta E 1.5 against a report claiming under 3.
The trade-offs
Neither is flawless. The Dell UltraSharp U2724DE has one clear weak point — 350 nits is dim in a bright room — and the BenQ PD2706U has its own: 60Hz only. Weigh those against how you actually work rather than against the spec sheet.
The value case
Price is not a tiebreaker here — both ask £549. The decision is entirely about which set of compromises you would rather live with, which is the harder question but the more honest one.
If neither quite fits
Look at the LG UltraFine 32UN880 at £599 — it scored 4 out of 5 and suits desk setups where clamp-mount space is tight. If the budget will not stretch, the AOC 24G2SPU at £149 is the cheapest option in this category we would still put our name to.
Living with each of them
On paper the gap looks like a specification difference; in use it is a habits difference. With the Dell UltraSharp U2724DE the thing you adjust to is 350 nits is dim in a bright room, and you do adjust — within a week it stops registering. Its panel (27in IPS Black, 2560x1440) is the part you stop thinking about. The BenQ PD2706U asks for a different accommodation: 60Hz only, against a panel of 27in IPS, 3840x2160 that holds up better than the number suggests. Neither compromise is severe. They are simply different, and which one you would rather not think about is a more useful question than which is objectively smaller.
Which one ages better
The Dell UltraSharp U2724DE is 1 year newer, which usually means 1 more year of security updates at the far end of ownership — the part of the decision nobody weighs at the till and everybody feels at year four. The other half of ageing is the weak point you already know about: 350 nits is dim in a bright room on one side, 60Hz only on the other. Weaknesses of that kind do not improve with firmware, so assume you are buying them for the life of the device and price the decision accordingly.
Our recommendation
For most people we would take the Dell UltraSharp U2724DE, which scored 5 out of 5 in our testing against 4 for the other. That said, a score is a summary, not a substitute for knowing what you need.
Buy the Dell UltraSharp U2724DE for iPS Black doubles the contrast of a normal IPS without OLED burn-in risk. Buy the BenQ PD2706U for factory calibrated with a printed report in the box.
Behind this piece
Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.
Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.
Where to go next
If you are weighing this against the rest of the monitors we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are Dell UltraSharp U2724DE vs Gigabyte M27Q P: Is the 2024 Model Worth the Change? and Dell UltraSharp U2724DE vs LG UltraFine 32UN880: Is the 2024 Model Worth the Change?.
For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.
