eero 6+ vs WRX560: Is the 2023 Model Worth the Change?
eero 6+ or WRX560? We compare price, measured performance and real-world trade-offs to work out which is the better buy.
Aisha Bello
The short answer
eero 6+ 5 minutes, WRX560 13 minutes — the same test, run the same way. Where they part company is who they suit: the eero 6+ is the one to get if you are flats and smaller houses where the ceiling is the broadband line, not the router, the WRX560 if you are anyone who wants to see and control exactly what is on their network.
Price difference: The eero 6+ undercuts the WRX560 by £120. That gap only matters if the extras below are ones you will actually use.
Specifications side by side
| Specification | eero 6+ | WRX560 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £139 | £259 |
| Our score | 3 / 5 | 4 / 5 |
| Standard | Wi-Fi 6 dual-band | Wi-Fi 6 dual-band |
| Throughput | 640Mbps at 5m, 210Mbps at 20m | 910Mbps at 5m, 300Mbps at 20m |
| Ports | 2x GbE per unit | 1x 2.5GbE, 3x GbE |
| Coverage | 140m² per unit | 170m² single unit |
| Backhaul | 5GHz shared | SRM mesh |
| Setup time | 5 minutes | 13 minutes |
How we tested
Every figure quoted above comes from the same protocol, run on every unit in this category. This one spent two weeks carrying the whole household, with the previous router boxed. A 2Gbps fibre line, a fixed Wi-Fi 7 laptop client, and the same four positions in a 180m² brick house on every system.
| What we measure | How |
|---|---|
| Throughput at 5m | iperf3 for five minutes, same room, line of sight, averaged across three runs. |
| Throughput at 20m | The same test two floors away through brick, which is where marketing figures collapse. |
| Roaming | Walking a fixed route with a continuous ping, counting dropped packets at each handover. |
| Setup time | From opening the box to a working connection, timed, using the app the maker intends. |
| Device load | Forty-two devices connected, then the 20m test repeated to see what congestion costs. |
We deliberately do not report combined band totals such as "BE22000", which no single client can ever reach.
The honest caveat: Every figure here is specific to one brick house. Timber-framed homes will see materially better range.
Where the eero 6+ wins
- The cheapest way into a mesh that actually roams properly
- Setup is genuinely five minutes
- The nodes are small enough to hide
It also has the edge on the intangibles: throughput on the second hop fell to 210Mbps, the largest drop we measured.
Where the WRX560 wins
- SRM is the best router software anyone ships, full stop
- Per-device traffic history going back months
- No subscription for parental controls or threat protection
And in day-to-day use, the traffic log identified a device phoning home every 30 seconds.
The trade-offs
Neither is flawless. The eero 6+ has one clear weak point — a shared backhaul halves throughput on the far node — and the WRX560 has its own: wi-Fi 6 only, with no 6GHz band. Weigh those against how you actually work rather than against the spec sheet.
The value case
The WRX560 costs £120 more and scores 1 point higher — roughly £120 per point of difference. Whether that is good value depends on whether the extra buys you sRM is the best router software anyone ships, full stop, or only a number. In our testing it is the former, but only just.
If neither quite fits
Look at the Eero Max 7 at £599 — it scored 4 out of 5 and suits large homes where setup simplicity matters more than tuning. If the budget will not stretch, the Flint 2 at £139 is the cheapest option in this category we would still put our name to.
Living with each of them
On paper the gap looks like a specification difference; in use it is a habits difference. With the eero 6+ the thing you adjust to is a shared backhaul halves throughput on the far node, and you do adjust — within a week it stops registering. Its standard (Wi-Fi 6 dual-band) is the part you stop thinking about. The WRX560 asks for a different accommodation: wi-Fi 6 only, with no 6GHz band, against a standard of Wi-Fi 6 dual-band that holds up better than the number suggests. Neither compromise is severe. They are simply different, and which one you would rather not think about is a more useful question than which is objectively smaller.
Which one ages better
The WRX560 is 1 year newer, which usually means 1 more year of security updates at the far end of ownership — the part of the decision nobody weighs at the till and everybody feels at year four. The other half of ageing is the weak point you already know about: wi-Fi 6 only, with no 6GHz band on one side, a shared backhaul halves throughput on the far node on the other. Weaknesses of that kind do not improve with firmware, so assume you are buying them for the life of the device and price the decision accordingly.
Our recommendation
For most people we would take the WRX560, which scored 4 out of 5 in our testing against 3 for the other. That said, a score is a summary, not a substitute for knowing what you need.
Buy the eero 6+ for the cheapest way into a mesh that actually roams properly. Buy the WRX560 for sRM is the best router software anyone ships, full stop.
Behind this piece
Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.
Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.
Where to go next
If you are weighing this against the rest of the networking we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are eero 6+: A Smart Device Will Not Join the Network and eero 6+: Devices Will Not Stay Connected to the Mesh.
For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.
