Skip to content
Cameras

Insta360 X4 vs Fujifilm X100VI: Is the Fujifilm X100VI Worth £1120 More?

Insta360 X4 or Fujifilm X100VI? We compare price, measured performance and real-world trade-offs to work out which is the better buy.

Priya Raghunathan 5 min read 1,881 views
Insta360 X4 vs Fujifilm X100VI: Is the Fujifilm X100VI Worth £1120 More?

The short answer

Insta360 X4 203g, Fujifilm X100VI 521g — the same test, run the same way. Where they part company is who they suit: the Insta360 X4 is the one to get if you are people filming activities where framing in the moment is impossible, the Fujifilm X100VI if you are street photographers who want one camera and no decisions.

Price difference: The Insta360 X4 undercuts the Fujifilm X100VI by £1120. That gap only matters if the extras below are ones you will actually use.

Specifications side by side

SpecificationInsta360 X4Fujifilm X100VI
Price£479£1599
Our score4 / 55 / 5
Video8K 360, 4K single-lens—
StabilisationFlowState6 stops IBIS
Battery135 minutes—
RatingWaterproof to 10m—
Weight203g521g
Sensor—40MP APS-C X-Trans
Lens—Fixed 23mm f/2
Viewfinder—Hybrid optical / electronic

How we tested

Every figure quoted above comes from the same protocol, run on every unit in this category. This one spent a fortnight of real shoots rather than a test chart weekend. The same three lenses where mounts allow, fixed white balance, and identical raw processing with all noise reduction and sharpening disabled.

What we measureHow
AutofocusKeeper rate across four hundred frames of moving subjects — a child, a dog, a cyclist — in falling light.
Dynamic rangeBracketed exposures pushed and pulled five stops in raw, judged on shadow noise and colour shift.
High ISOThe same low-light scene at every stop from base to maximum, compared at 100%.
BufferFrames captured at maximum burst before the buffer stalls, on a card we specify rather than the fastest available.
Battery lifeFrames per charge on a mixed shoot, with review and stabilisation on as most people leave them.

We deliberately do not report megapixel counts, which stopped being the limiting factor on any of this hardware years ago.

The honest caveat: Autofocus is firmware, and firmware changes. Our figures describe the camera as shipped on the date given.

Where the Insta360 X4 wins

  • Reframing after the fact, which removes the need to aim
  • Genuinely stable 8K 360 capture
  • A removable lens guard

It also has the edge on the intangibles: shoot first and choose the framing later is a genuinely different way to work.

Where the Fujifilm X100VI wins

  • A hybrid viewfinder nothing else offers
  • Stabilisation in a fixed-lens compact
  • Film simulations straight out of camera

And in day-to-day use, the fixed 23mm forces you to move, which makes you a better photographer.

The trade-offs

Neither is flawless. The Insta360 X4 has one clear weak point — editing 360 footage is slow and storage-hungry — and the Fujifilm X100VI has its own: a fixed focal length that will not suit everyone. Weigh those against how you actually work rather than against the spec sheet.

The value case

The Fujifilm X100VI costs £1120 more and scores 1 point higher — roughly £1120 per point of difference. Whether that is good value depends on whether the extra buys you a hybrid viewfinder nothing else offers, or only a number. In our testing it is the former, but only just.

If neither quite fits

Look at the Sony A7 V at £2499 — it scored 5 out of 5 and suits hybrid shooters who need one body for stills and video. If the budget will not stretch, the DJI Pocket 3 at £519 is the cheapest option in this category we would still put our name to.

Living with each of them

On paper the gap looks like a specification difference; in use it is a habits difference. With the Insta360 X4 the thing you adjust to is editing 360 footage is slow and storage-hungry, and you do adjust — within a week it stops registering. Its video (8K 360, 4K single-lens) is the part you stop thinking about. The Fujifilm X100VI asks for a different accommodation: a fixed focal length that will not suit everyone, against a sensor of 40MP APS-C X-Trans that holds up better than the number suggests. Neither compromise is severe. They are simply different, and which one you would rather not think about is a more useful question than which is objectively smaller.

Which one ages better

Both launched in 2024, so neither starts with a support-window advantage. The other half of ageing is the weak point you already know about: editing 360 footage is slow and storage-hungry on one side, a fixed focal length that will not suit everyone on the other. Weaknesses of that kind do not improve with firmware, so assume you are buying them for the life of the device and price the decision accordingly.

Our recommendation

For most people we would take the Fujifilm X100VI, which scored 5 out of 5 in our testing against 4 for the other. That said, a score is a summary, not a substitute for knowing what you need.

Buy the Insta360 X4 for reframing after the fact, which removes the need to aim. Buy the Fujifilm X100VI for a hybrid viewfinder nothing else offers.

Behind this piece

How we tested this — Insta360 X4 vs Fujifilm X100VI: Is the Fujifilm X100VI Worth...
How Tech Daily Review tests the hardware it writes about.

Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.

Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.

Where to go next

If you are weighing this against the rest of the cameras we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are Insta360 X4 vs Sony A7 V: Is the 2025 Model Worth the Change? and Insta360 X4: Battery Draining Faster Than It Should.

For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your priorities. The Insta360 X4 is stronger on reframing after the fact, which removes the need to aim, while the Fujifilm X100VI leads on a hybrid viewfinder nothing else offers.
The Insta360 X4 is £1120 cheaper, which makes it the better value unless you specifically need a hybrid viewfinder nothing else offers.
We measured 135 minutes in our standard test. For the Fujifilm X100VI: battery life varies with use; see the specifications table in the review.
Yes — the same suite, the same conditions, the same reviewer. That is the only reason these numbers can be put side by side at all.
The Fujifilm X100VI, on balance. It scored 5 out of 5 against 4, and the margin held up over a fortnight rather than being a first-impressions verdict.
Only if your current device still does the job. Both of these are 2024 hardware, and the replacement cycle in this category is long enough that waiting usually costs you a year of use to save very little.

Priya Raghunathan

Audio editor and a reformed studio engineer. Measures everything, trusts her ears anyway, and will argue about EQ curves for longer than anyone wants.

Please login to comment.

Comments (0)

No comments yet.

Keep reading