Skip to content
Smart Home

IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover (Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen))

IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover explained, with the Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen)'s own measured figures as the worked example: an IP rating describes tested resistance to...

Tom Halvorsen 4 min read 4,602 views
IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover (Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen))

The short version

Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen), power Wired, 16-24VAC — IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover. Measured on hardware rather than argued from theory, on a device we rate for three hours of history without paying.

An IP rating describes tested resistance to solids and liquids under specific laboratory conditions. It is not a warranty against water damage.

Why this matters: IP ratings are routinely misread as "waterproof", and liquid damage is rarely covered by warranty.

What is going on underneath

The first digit covers solids, the second liquids. IP54 means dust-protected and splash-resistant. IP67 adds immersion to one metre for thirty minutes. IP68 goes deeper, but the manufacturer defines the depth. Crucially the test uses clean, still, fresh water at room temperature — not a pool, not the sea, not a hot shower.

In daily use

Take the Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) as a worked example. The taller aspect ratio is the single most useful thing about it. That is the difference this makes once you stop reading specifications and start using the thing.

SpecificationNest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen)
Video1440p HDR, 3:4 aspect
Field of view166 degrees
PowerWired, 16-24VAC
Storage3 hours free, subscription for more

The spread across devices

One worked example is an anecdote. Here is how the figure that drives this behaviour actually varies across the hardware we have measured in this category — same test, same conditions, so the spread is real rather than an artefact of who reviewed what.

ModelVideoPriceOur score
Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen)1440p HDR, 3:4 aspect£1794 / 5
Eufy S3 Pro Cam4K, dual spotlight£2194 / 5
Meross Smart Plug Mini—£124 / 5
Aqara Presence Sensor FP2—£744 / 5

What counts as good here

It helps to have a number in mind before you start comparing. Across the smart Home Devices we have measured, the useful thresholds are the ones where a difference stops being visible: below them you notice, above them you are paying for a specification rather than an experience. The Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) reports 1440p HDR, 3:4 aspect for video, which sits comfortably on the right side of that line, and 166 degrees for field of view. Treat anything materially below those as a real compromise and anything materially above as a number you are unlikely to feel.

How to check this on your own device

  1. Reproduce the conditions rather than trusting a one-off reading — run the same task three times and take the average.
  2. Note the figure your device reports and the figure it actually achieves; on the Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen) those diverge under sustained load.
  3. Change one variable at a time. Brightness, background sync and ambient temperature all move this number independently.
  4. Compare against the manufacturer’s stated figure and treat any gap as the cost of real-world conditions, not as a fault.
  5. Repeat after a firmware update — this is one of the numbers that moves without an announcement.

How to use this when buying

Treat any IP rating as protection against accidents, not permission to submerge deliberately.

IP ratings describe a lab test, not your bathroom.

Behind this piece

How we tested this — IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover...
How Tech Daily Review tests the hardware it writes about.

Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.

Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.

Where to go next

If you are weighing this against the rest of the smart home we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover (Philips Hue Bridge Pro) and IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover (Roborock S9 MaxV).

For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.

Frequently asked questions

It is not advisable. The rating is tested in still fresh water; chlorine, salt and movement all exceed the test conditions.
Broadly, though the effect is most visible on smart Home Devices like the Nest Doorbell (wired, 2nd gen).
Run the same task three times and average the result. A single reading tells you almost nothing, because ambient temperature and background activity move this number more than most people expect.
Frequently, and rarely with an announcement. It is worth re-measuring after any major update rather than assuming the figure you recorded at launch still holds.
Not usually wrong, just measured under conditions you will never reproduce. Treat the gap as the cost of real-world use rather than as a defect.

Tom Halvorsen

Cameras and lenses. Shot weddings for a decade before deciding that reviewing the gear was less stressful than relying on it. Still carries two bodies everywhere.

Please login to comment.

Comments (0)

No comments yet.

Keep reading