Skip to content
Tablets

IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover (Pixel Tablet)

IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover explained, with the Pixel Tablet's own measured figures as the worked example: an IP rating describes tested resistance to solids and liquid...

Aisha Bello 4 min read 5,408 views
IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover (Pixel Tablet)

The gist of it

Pixel Tablet, display 10.95in IPS, 60Hz — IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover. Measured on hardware rather than argued from theory, on a device we rate for seamless handoff with a Pixel phone.

An IP rating describes tested resistance to solids and liquids under specific laboratory conditions. It is not a warranty against water damage.

Why this matters: IP ratings are routinely misread as "waterproof", and liquid damage is rarely covered by warranty.

What is going on underneath

The first digit covers solids, the second liquids. IP54 means dust-protected and splash-resistant. IP67 adds immersion to one metre for thirty minutes. IP68 goes deeper, but the manufacturer defines the depth. Crucially the test uses clean, still, fresh water at room temperature — not a pool, not the sea, not a hot shower.

In daily use

Take the Pixel Tablet as a worked example. It spent 80 percent of our two weeks sitting on the dock. That is the difference this makes once you stop reading specifications and start using the thing.

SpecificationPixel Tablet
Display10.95in IPS, 60Hz
ChipTensor G2
RAM8GB
Storage128GB
Weight493g
Battery27Wh
Screen-on time8h 40m

The spread across devices

One worked example is an anecdote. Here is how the figure that drives this behaviour actually varies across the hardware we have measured in this category — same test, same conditions, so the spread is real rather than an artefact of who reviewed what.

ModelDisplayPriceOur score
Pixel Tablet10.95in IPS, 60Hz£5993 / 5
iPad Pro 13 (M4)13in tandem OLED, 120Hz£12995 / 5
iPad Air 11 (M2)11in IPS, 60Hz£5994 / 5
Galaxy Tab S10 Ultra14.6in AMOLED, 120Hz£11994 / 5

Where the line sits

It helps to have a number in mind before you start comparing. Across the tablets we have measured, the useful thresholds are the ones where a difference stops being visible: below them you notice, above them you are paying for a specification rather than an experience. The Pixel Tablet reports 10.95in IPS, 60Hz for display, which sits comfortably on the right side of that line, and Tensor G2 for chip. Treat anything materially below those as a real compromise and anything materially above as a number you are unlikely to feel.

Myths worth dropping

  • IP68 means you can swim with it
  • The rating lasts the life of the device, when seals degrade
  • A higher second digit covers everything the lower one does in every case

How to check this on your own device

  1. Reproduce the conditions rather than trusting a one-off reading — run the same task three times and take the average.
  2. Note the figure your device reports and the figure it actually achieves; on the Pixel Tablet those diverge under sustained load.
  3. Change one variable at a time. Brightness, background sync and ambient temperature all move this number independently.
  4. Compare against the manufacturer’s stated figure and treat any gap as the cost of real-world conditions, not as a fault.
  5. Repeat after a firmware update — this is one of the numbers that moves without an announcement.

Where it shows up on a spec sheet

On a tablet listing this usually appears as the display line — the Pixel Tablet quotes 10.95in IPS, 60Hz. That figure is necessary but not sufficient: the chip entry (Tensor G2) constrains it in practice, and the two are almost never presented together. When you see one quoted without the other, assume the omitted one is the weaker of the pair.

How to use this when buying

Treat any IP rating as protection against accidents, not permission to submerge deliberately.

IP ratings describe a lab test, not your bathroom.

Behind this piece

How we tested this — IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover...
How Tech Daily Review tests the hardware it writes about.

Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.

Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.

Where to go next

If you are weighing this against the rest of the tablets we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover (Surface Pro 11) and IP Ratings Explained: What IP54, IP67 and IP68 Really Cover (iPad Air 11 (M2)).

For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.

Frequently asked questions

It is not advisable. The rating is tested in still fresh water; chlorine, salt and movement all exceed the test conditions.
Broadly, though the effect is most visible on tablets like the Pixel Tablet.
Run the same task three times and average the result. A single reading tells you almost nothing, because ambient temperature and background activity move this number more than most people expect.
Frequently, and rarely with an announcement. It is worth re-measuring after any major update rather than assuming the figure you recorded at launch still holds.
Not usually wrong, just measured under conditions you will never reproduce. Treat the gap as the cost of real-world use rather than as a defect.

Aisha Bello

Smart home and everything that talks to it. Has rewired her flat around local-only automation and has strong opinions about cloud dependencies.

Please login to comment.

Comments (0)

No comments yet.

Keep reading