Skip to content
Smartphones

iPhone 16 Pro vs OnePlus 13: Is the 2025 Model Worth the Change?

iPhone 16 Pro or OnePlus 13? We compare price, measured performance and real-world trade-offs to work out which is the better buy.

Aisha Bello 6 min read 872 views
iPhone 16 Pro vs OnePlus 13: Is the 2025 Model Worth the Change?

The short answer

iPhone 16 Pro 7h 10m, OnePlus 13 8h 15m — the same test, run the same way. Where they part company is who they suit: the iPhone 16 Pro is the one to get if you are anyone shooting video, or already invested in the Apple ecosystem, the OnePlus 13 if you are heavy users who would rather charge for fifteen minutes than carry a power bank.

Price difference: The OnePlus 13 undercuts the iPhone 16 Pro by £200. That gap only matters if the extras below are ones you will actually use.

Specifications side by side

SpecificationiPhone 16 ProOnePlus 13
Price£1099£899
Our score4 / 54 / 5
Display6.3in LTPO OLED, 120Hz6.82in LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz
ChipA18 ProSnapdragon 8 Elite
RAM8GB12GB
Battery3582mAh6000mAh
Charging25W wired, MagSafe100W wired
Weight199g210g
Screen-on time7h 10m8h 15m

How we tested

Every figure quoted above comes from the same protocol, run on every unit in this category. This one spent fourteen days as the reviewer’s only phone, SIM included. Screen at a metered 200 nits, adaptive refresh left on, the same twelve apps installed on every handset, and a fixed 5G network in the same building.

What we measureHow
Screen-on timeA scripted day — four hours of mixed browsing, an hour of video, thirty minutes of camera, the rest idle — repeated three times and averaged.
Sustained performanceTwenty minutes of continuous load, reporting the figure at the end rather than the peak in the first ninety seconds.
ChargingFrom 2% to 100% with the fastest charger the manufacturer sells, at 22°C ambient, timed to the minute.
CameraThe same eighteen scenes on every phone — backlit portrait, indoor low light, moving subject — shot in the default mode with no editing.
ThermalsSurface temperature at the hottest point after the sustained run, measured with a contact probe.

We deliberately do not report synthetic benchmark totals quoted in isolation, and any figure supplied by the manufacturer.

The honest caveat: Battery results are specific to our routine. A heavy camera user will see materially less screen-on time than these numbers suggest.

Where the iPhone 16 Pro wins

  • The best sustained performance of any phone
  • Video quality nothing else matches
  • A display that needed no calibration out of the box

It also has the edge on the intangibles: it lost only 11 percent of peak performance over a thirty-minute load.

Where the OnePlus 13 wins

  • Charging speed nothing else approaches
  • The largest battery in its class
  • The best anti-reflective display coating we have measured

And in day-to-day use, zero to sixty-two percent in fifteen minutes, and full in thirty-four.

The trade-offs

Neither is flawless. The iPhone 16 Pro has one clear weak point — iterative to a fault — and the OnePlus 13 has its own: camera processing is inconsistent shot to shot. Weigh those against how you actually work rather than against the spec sheet.

The value case

Both scored 4 out of 5, and the OnePlus 13 costs £200 less. Unless the best sustained performance of any phone is specifically what you need, the cheaper one is the better buy and we would not agonise over it.

If neither quite fits

Look at the Pixel 9a at £499 — it scored 5 out of 5 and suits almost everyone — the sensible default recommendation. If the budget will not stretch, the Galaxy A56 at £399 is the cheapest option in this category we would still put our name to.

Living with each of them

On paper the gap looks like a specification difference; in use it is a habits difference. With the iPhone 16 Pro the thing you adjust to is iterative to a fault, and you do adjust — within a week it stops registering. Its display (6.3in LTPO OLED, 120Hz) is the part you stop thinking about. The OnePlus 13 asks for a different accommodation: camera processing is inconsistent shot to shot, against a display of 6.82in LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz that holds up better than the number suggests. Neither compromise is severe. They are simply different, and which one you would rather not think about is a more useful question than which is objectively smaller.

Which one ages better

The OnePlus 13 is 1 year newer, which usually means 1 more year of security updates at the far end of ownership — the part of the decision nobody weighs at the till and everybody feels at year four. The other half of ageing is the weak point you already know about: camera processing is inconsistent shot to shot on one side, iterative to a fault on the other. Weaknesses of that kind do not improve with firmware, so assume you are buying them for the life of the device and price the decision accordingly.

Our recommendation

For most people we would take the iPhone 16 Pro, which scored 4 out of 5 in our testing against 4 for the other. That said, a score is a summary, not a substitute for knowing what you need.

Buy the iPhone 16 Pro for the best sustained performance of any phone. Buy the OnePlus 13 for charging speed nothing else approaches.

Behind this piece

How we tested this — iPhone 16 Pro vs OnePlus 13: Is the 2025 Model Worth the Cha...
How Tech Daily Review tests the hardware it writes about.

Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.

Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.

Where to go next

If you are weighing this against the rest of the smartphones we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are iPhone 16 Pro vs Pixel 9a: Is the 2025 Model Worth the Change? and iPhone 16 Pro vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra: Is the 2025 Model Worth the Change?.

For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.

Frequently asked questions

It depends on your priorities. The iPhone 16 Pro is stronger on the best sustained performance of any phone, while the OnePlus 13 leads on charging speed nothing else approaches.
The OnePlus 13 is £200 cheaper, which makes it the better value unless you specifically need the best sustained performance of any phone.
We measured 7h 10m in our standard test. For the OnePlus 13: we measured 8h 15m in our standard test.
Yes — the same suite, the same conditions, the same reviewer. That is the only reason these numbers can be put side by side at all.
The iPhone 16 Pro, on balance. It scored 4 out of 5 against 4, and the margin held up over a fortnight rather than being a first-impressions verdict.
Only if your current device still does the job. Both of these are 2025 hardware, and the replacement cycle in this category is long enough that waiting usually costs you a year of use to save very little.

Aisha Bello

Smart home and everything that talks to it. Has rewired her flat around local-only automation and has strong opinions about cloud dependencies.

Please login to comment.

Comments (0)

No comments yet.

Keep reading