Skip to content
Cameras

Refresh Rate vs Response Time: Which Actually Affects What You See (Sony A7 V)

Refresh Rate vs Response Time: Which Actually Affects What You See explained, with the Sony A7 V's own measured figures as the worked example: refresh rate is how often a panel redraws; response time...

Priya Raghunathan 4 min read 5,716 views
Refresh Rate vs Response Time: Which Actually Affects What You See (Sony A7 V)

The gist of it

Sony A7 V, stabilisation 8 stops IBIS — Refresh Rate vs Response Time: Which Actually Affects What You See. Measured on hardware rather than argued from theory, on a device we rate for around fourteen and a half stops of usable dynamic range.

Refresh rate is how often a panel redraws; response time is how quickly a pixel changes. A high refresh rate with slow pixels still looks smeared.

Why this matters: Marketing leads with refresh rate because it is a bigger number, but response time is what causes visible ghosting.

What is going on underneath

A 120Hz panel presents a new frame every 8.3ms. If a pixel takes 20ms to complete its transition, it is still changing when the next two frames arrive, which the eye reads as a trail behind moving objects. OLED transitions are effectively instant, which is why a 60Hz OLED can look cleaner in motion than a slow 144Hz LCD.

What it looks like in practice

Take the Sony A7 V as a worked example. A 94 percent keeper rate on a cyclist through partial occlusion at 10fps. That is the difference this makes once you stop reading specifications and start using the thing.

SpecificationSony A7 V
Sensor33MP full-frame BSI CMOS
Burst10fps mechanical, 30fps electronic
Video4K/60 10-bit, 6K oversampled
Stabilisation8 stops IBIS
StorageDual CFexpress A / SD

How it varies across the category

One worked example is an anecdote. Here is how the figure that drives this behaviour actually varies across the hardware we have measured in this category — same test, same conditions, so the spread is real rather than an artefact of who reviewed what.

ModelSensorPriceOur score
Sony A7 V33MP full-frame BSI CMOS£24995 / 5
Nikon Z6 III24.5MP partially stacked CMOS£21994 / 5
Sony ZV-E10 II26MP APS-C BSI CMOS£9994 / 5
Insta360 X4—£4794 / 5

Where the line sits

It helps to have a number in mind before you start comparing. Across the cameras we have measured, the useful thresholds are the ones where a difference stops being visible: below them you notice, above them you are paying for a specification rather than an experience. The Sony A7 V reports 33MP full-frame BSI CMOS for sensor, which sits comfortably on the right side of that line, and 10fps mechanical, 30fps electronic for burst. Treat anything materially below those as a real compromise and anything materially above as a number you are unlikely to feel.

How to check this on your own device

  1. Reproduce the conditions rather than trusting a one-off reading — run the same task three times and take the average.
  2. Note the figure your device reports and the figure it actually achieves; on the Sony A7 V those diverge under sustained load.
  3. Change one variable at a time. Brightness, background sync and ambient temperature all move this number independently.
  4. Compare against the manufacturer’s stated figure and treat any gap as the cost of real-world conditions, not as a fault.
  5. Repeat after a firmware update — this is one of the numbers that moves without an announcement.

What to do with this

For motion clarity, weight panel technology and response time at least as heavily as the refresh number.

A fast panel with slow pixels is still a slow panel.

Behind this piece

How we tested this — Refresh Rate vs Response Time: Which Actually Affects What Y...
How Tech Daily Review tests the hardware it writes about.

Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.

Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.

Where to go next

If you are weighing this against the rest of the cameras we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are Refresh Rate vs Response Time: Which Actually Affects What You See (Sony ZV-E10 II) and Sensor Size Explained, and Why It Beats Megapixels (Canon EOS R6 Mark III).

For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.

Frequently asked questions

On an OLED, yes — the transitions are quick enough to show the benefit. On a slow LCD the gain is much smaller than the number suggests.
Broadly, though the effect is most visible on cameras like the Sony A7 V.
Run the same task three times and average the result. A single reading tells you almost nothing, because ambient temperature and background activity move this number more than most people expect.
Frequently, and rarely with an announcement. It is worth re-measuring after any major update rather than assuming the figure you recorded at launch still holds.
Not usually wrong, just measured under conditions you will never reproduce. Treat the gap as the cost of real-world use rather than as a defect.

Priya Raghunathan

Audio editor and a reformed studio engineer. Measures everything, trusts her ears anyway, and will argue about EQ curves for longer than anyone wants.

Please login to comment.

Comments (0)

No comments yet.

Keep reading