Refresh Rate vs Response Time: Which Actually Affects What You See (Sony WH-1000XM6)
Refresh Rate vs Response Time: Which Actually Affects What You See explained, with the Sony WH-1000XM6's own measured figures as the worked example: refresh rate is how often a panel redraws; response...
Maya Okonkwo
The gist of it
Sony WH-1000XM6, drivers 30mm carbon fibre — Refresh Rate vs Response Time: Which Actually Affects What You See. Measured on hardware rather than argued from theory, on a device we rate for a genuinely useful ten-band EQ.
Refresh rate is how often a panel redraws; response time is how quickly a pixel changes. A high refresh rate with slow pixels still looks smeared.
Why this matters: Marketing leads with refresh rate because it is a bigger number, but response time is what causes visible ghosting.
The mechanism
A 120Hz panel presents a new frame every 8.3ms. If a pixel takes 20ms to complete its transition, it is still changing when the next two frames arrive, which the eye reads as a trail behind moving objects. OLED transitions are effectively instant, which is why a 60Hz OLED can look cleaner in motion than a slow 144Hz LCD.
What you actually notice
Take the Sony WH-1000XM6 as a worked example. Aircraft cabin noise essentially disappears. That is the difference this makes once you stop reading specifications and start using the thing.
| Specification | Sony WH-1000XM6 |
|---|---|
| Type | Over-ear, closed |
| Drivers | 30mm carbon fibre |
| Codecs | SBC, AAC, LDAC |
| Battery | 31h with ANC |
| Weight | 250g |
| Extras | Multipoint, folding hinge |
The spread across devices
One worked example is an anecdote. Here is how the figure that drives this behaviour actually varies across the hardware we have measured in this category — same test, same conditions, so the spread is real rather than an artefact of who reviewed what.
| Model | Type | Price | Our score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sony WH-1000XM6 | Over-ear, closed | £399 | 5 / 5 |
| Sonos Era 300 | Powered speaker | £449 | 4 / 5 |
| Beyerdynamic DT 700 Pro X | Over-ear, closed, wired | £259 | 4 / 5 |
| Bose QuietComfort Ultra | Over-ear, closed | £379 | 4 / 5 |
What counts as good here
It helps to have a number in mind before you start comparing. Across the audio we have measured, the useful thresholds are the ones where a difference stops being visible: below them you notice, above them you are paying for a specification rather than an experience. The Sony WH-1000XM6 reports Over-ear, closed for type, which sits comfortably on the right side of that line, and 30mm carbon fibre for drivers. Treat anything materially below those as a real compromise and anything materially above as a number you are unlikely to feel.
What people get wrong
- A higher refresh rate always looks smoother regardless of panel type
- Response time only matters for gaming
- The advertised response time is measured the same way by every manufacturer
How to check this on your own device
- Reproduce the conditions rather than trusting a one-off reading — run the same task three times and take the average.
- Note the figure your device reports and the figure it actually achieves; on the Sony WH-1000XM6 those diverge under sustained load.
- Change one variable at a time. Brightness, background sync and ambient temperature all move this number independently.
- Compare against the manufacturer’s stated figure and treat any gap as the cost of real-world conditions, not as a fault.
- Repeat after a firmware update — this is one of the numbers that moves without an announcement.
Reading it off the spec sheet
On a audio listing this usually appears as the type line — the Sony WH-1000XM6 quotes Over-ear, closed. That figure is necessary but not sufficient: the drivers entry (30mm carbon fibre) constrains it in practice, and the two are almost never presented together. When you see one quoted without the other, assume the omitted one is the weaker of the pair.
What to do with this
For motion clarity, weight panel technology and response time at least as heavily as the refresh number.
A fast panel with slow pixels is still a slow panel.
Behind this piece
Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.
Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.
Where to go next
If you are weighing this against the rest of the audio we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are Sennheiser Momentum 4 Review: The Long-Haul Pick and Sennheiser Momentum 4 Review: Very Good, With Caveats.
For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.
