The Best Smartphones Overall in 2026
We tested every option to find the best smartphones overall. Our pick is the Pixel 9a, with the Galaxy A56 as the value choice.
Tech Daily Review Desk
What actually decides this
Judged on overall, the Pixel 9a at £499 is what we would buy: it delivers flagship camera processing at mid-range money. Across the 8 smartphones we tested for this list, prices run from £399 to £1299. This is our general recommendation list, weighted towards devices that do most things well rather than one thing brilliantly.
Everything below has been through our standard test suite, so the figures are comparable rather than quoted from a manufacturer.
Our top pick
Pixel 9a — £499. It delivers flagship camera processing at mid-range money, and it suits almost everyone — the sensible default recommendation. in daylight we struggled to tell its photographs from the 9 Pro.
Best for the money
Galaxy A56 — £399. It gives up middling low-light photography, but for the money the compromise is easy to accept.
The full shortlist
| Model | Price | Score | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pixel 9a | £499 | 5 / 5 | Almost everyone — the sensible default recommendation |
| Pixel 9 Pro | £999 | 4 / 5 | Photographers who want the best point-and-shoot results with no editing |
| iPhone 16 Pro | £1099 | 4 / 5 | Anyone shooting video, or already invested in the Apple ecosystem |
| Galaxy S25 Ultra | £1249 | 4 / 5 | People who write or draw on their phone, and long-range shooters |
| Nothing Phone 3 | £579 | 4 / 5 | Buyers who want flagship battery and software without flagship pricing |
| OnePlus 13 | £899 | 4 / 5 | Heavy users who would rather charge for fifteen minutes than carry a power bank |
| Xiaomi 15 Ultra | £1299 | 4 / 5 | Photographers who want the closest thing to a compact camera in a phone |
| Galaxy A56 | £399 | 4 / 5 | Buyers who want long software support on a tight budget |
Who each pick is for
| Model | Right for | What you give up |
|---|---|---|
| Pixel 9a | Almost everyone — the sensible default recommendation | No telephoto |
| Pixel 9 Pro | Photographers who want the best point-and-shoot results with no editing | The Tensor chip throttles under sustained load |
| iPhone 16 Pro | Anyone shooting video, or already invested in the Apple ecosystem | Iterative to a fault |
| Galaxy S25 Ultra | People who write or draw on their phone, and long-range shooters | Heavy at 232g |
| Nothing Phone 3 | Buyers who want flagship battery and software without flagship pricing | Weak low-light photography |
| OnePlus 13 | Heavy users who would rather charge for fifteen minutes than carry a power bank | Camera processing is inconsistent shot to shot |
| Xiaomi 15 Ultra | Photographers who want the closest thing to a compact camera in a phone | Heavy |
| Galaxy A56 | Buyers who want long software support on a tight budget | Middling low-light photography |
How we tested
Every figure quoted above comes from the same protocol, run on every unit in this category. This one spent fourteen days as the reviewer’s only phone, SIM included. Screen at a metered 200 nits, adaptive refresh left on, the same twelve apps installed on every handset, and a fixed 5G network in the same building.
| What we measure | How |
|---|---|
| Screen-on time | A scripted day — four hours of mixed browsing, an hour of video, thirty minutes of camera, the rest idle — repeated three times and averaged. |
| Sustained performance | Twenty minutes of continuous load, reporting the figure at the end rather than the peak in the first ninety seconds. |
| Charging | From 2% to 100% with the fastest charger the manufacturer sells, at 22°C ambient, timed to the minute. |
| Camera | The same eighteen scenes on every phone — backlit portrait, indoor low light, moving subject — shot in the default mode with no editing. |
| Thermals | Surface temperature at the hottest point after the sustained run, measured with a contact probe. |
We deliberately do not report synthetic benchmark totals quoted in isolation, and any figure supplied by the manufacturer.
The honest caveat: Battery results are specific to our routine. A heavy camera user will see materially less screen-on time than these numbers suggest.
Beyond the spec sheet
- Headline numbers measured in a burst — sustained figures are what you live with, and they are always lower
- Any figure quoted by the manufacturer without stating the conditions it was measured under
- Price as a proxy for quality — the Xiaomi 15 Ultra is the most expensive here at £1299 and the Pixel 9a scored higher for less
- Spec-sheet parity between two smartphones, which routinely hides a large difference in how they behave after twenty minutes of use
How this list was built
Each device stayed in use for at least two weeks. Battery figures come from a fixed-brightness rundown, performance from a sustained load rather than a burst benchmark, and the verdicts from living with the thing rather than reading its spec sheet.
When to buy
The shortlist above spans 1 model years, from the Pixel 9 Pro (2024) to the Pixel 9a (2025). That matters for timing: the previous generation is at its cheapest in the weeks after a replacement is announced, and the replacement is at its most expensive in exactly the same weeks. If nothing here is an urgent purchase, buying one generation back is consistently the better value — the measured gap between adjacent generations in this category is smaller than the price gap between them. If you are replacing something that has actually failed, buy the current pick and do not wait for a rumour.
What to avoid
Be wary of buying on peak benchmark numbers alone — sustained performance and battery life are what you notice daily. Launch-week discounts on last year models are usually the better deal.
If you want one answer: buy the Pixel 9a. If budget is the constraint, the Galaxy A56 is the sensible alternative.
Behind this piece
Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.
Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.
Where to go next
If you are weighing this against the rest of the smartphones we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are USB-C After the Mandate: A Drawer of Cables, Tested and Understanding Bluetooth Codecs: SBC, AAC, aptX and LDAC (Galaxy A56).
For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.
