Eero Max 7 vs WRX560: Is the Eero Max 7 Worth £340 More?
Eero Max 7 or WRX560? We compare price, measured performance and real-world trade-offs to work out which is the better buy.
Priya Raghunathan
The short answer
Eero Max 7 6 minutes, WRX560 13 minutes — the same test, run the same way. Where they part company is who they suit: the Eero Max 7 is the one to get if you are large homes where setup simplicity matters more than tuning, the WRX560 if you are anyone who wants to see and control exactly what is on their network.
Price difference: The WRX560 undercuts the Eero Max 7 by £340. That gap only matters if the extras below are ones you will actually use.
Specifications side by side
| Specification | Eero Max 7 | WRX560 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £599 | £259 |
| Our score | 4 / 5 | 4 / 5 |
| Standard | Wi-Fi 7 tri-band | Wi-Fi 6 dual-band |
| Throughput | 1.6Gbps at 5m, 640Mbps at 20m | 910Mbps at 5m, 300Mbps at 20m |
| Ports | 2x 10GbE, 2x 2.5GbE | 1x 2.5GbE, 3x GbE |
| Coverage | 230m² per unit | 170m² single unit |
| Backhaul | Wired or 6GHz wireless | SRM mesh |
| Setup time | 6 minutes | 13 minutes |
How we tested
Every figure quoted above comes from the same protocol, run on every unit in this category. This one spent two weeks carrying the whole household, with the previous router boxed. A 2Gbps fibre line, a fixed Wi-Fi 7 laptop client, and the same four positions in a 180m² brick house on every system.
| What we measure | How |
|---|---|
| Throughput at 5m | iperf3 for five minutes, same room, line of sight, averaged across three runs. |
| Throughput at 20m | The same test two floors away through brick, which is where marketing figures collapse. |
| Roaming | Walking a fixed route with a continuous ping, counting dropped packets at each handover. |
| Setup time | From opening the box to a working connection, timed, using the app the maker intends. |
| Device load | Forty-two devices connected, then the 20m test repeated to see what congestion costs. |
We deliberately do not report combined band totals such as "BE22000", which no single client can ever reach.
The honest caveat: Every figure here is specific to one brick house. Timber-framed homes will see materially better range.
Where the Eero Max 7 wins
- The simplest setup of any mesh system we have tested
- 10GbE on both ports, which almost nothing else offers
- Roaming between nodes is genuinely seamless
It also has the edge on the intangibles: it held 640Mbps at 20m through two brick walls.
Where the WRX560 wins
- SRM is the best router software anyone ships, full stop
- Per-device traffic history going back months
- No subscription for parental controls or threat protection
And in day-to-day use, the traffic log identified a device phoning home every 30 seconds.
The trade-offs
Neither is flawless. The Eero Max 7 has one clear weak point — the price per node is hard to justify for most homes — and the WRX560 has its own: wi-Fi 6 only, with no 6GHz band. Weigh those against how you actually work rather than against the spec sheet.
The value case
Both scored 4 out of 5, and the WRX560 costs £340 less. Unless the simplest setup of any mesh system we have tested is specifically what you need, the cheaper one is the better buy and we would not agonise over it.
If neither quite fits
Look at the TP-Link Deco XE75 at £229 — it scored 4 out of 5 and suits most homes — the sensible default unless you have a multi-gig line. If the budget will not stretch, the eero 6+ at £139 is the cheapest option in this category we would still put our name to.
Living with each of them
On paper the gap looks like a specification difference; in use it is a habits difference. With the Eero Max 7 the thing you adjust to is the price per node is hard to justify for most homes, and you do adjust — within a week it stops registering. Its standard (Wi-Fi 7 tri-band) is the part you stop thinking about. The WRX560 asks for a different accommodation: wi-Fi 6 only, with no 6GHz band, against a standard of Wi-Fi 6 dual-band that holds up better than the number suggests. Neither compromise is severe. They are simply different, and which one you would rather not think about is a more useful question than which is objectively smaller.
Which one ages better
Both launched in 2023, so neither starts with a support-window advantage. The other half of ageing is the weak point you already know about: the price per node is hard to justify for most homes on one side, wi-Fi 6 only, with no 6GHz band on the other. Weaknesses of that kind do not improve with firmware, so assume you are buying them for the life of the device and price the decision accordingly.
Our recommendation
For most people we would take the Eero Max 7, which scored 4 out of 5 in our testing against 4 for the other. That said, a score is a summary, not a substitute for knowing what you need.
Buy the Eero Max 7 for the simplest setup of any mesh system we have tested. Buy the WRX560 for sRM is the best router software anyone ships, full stop.
Behind this piece
Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.
Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.
Where to go next
If you are weighing this against the rest of the networking we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are Eero Max 7 vs eero 6+: Is the 2023 Model Worth the Change? and Eero Max 7: A Smart Device Will Not Join the Network.
For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.
