TP-Link Deco XE75 vs eero 6+: Is the TP-Link Deco XE75 Worth £90 More?
TP-Link Deco XE75 or eero 6+? We compare price, measured performance and real-world trade-offs to work out which is the better buy.
Daniel Reyes
The short answer
TP-Link Deco XE75 9 minutes, eero 6+ 5 minutes — the same test, run the same way. Where they part company is who they suit: the TP-Link Deco XE75 is the one to get if you are most homes — the sensible default unless you have a multi-gig line, the eero 6+ if you are flats and smaller houses where the ceiling is the broadband line, not the router.
Price difference: The eero 6+ undercuts the TP-Link Deco XE75 by £90. That gap only matters if the extras below are ones you will actually use.
Specifications side by side
| Specification | TP-Link Deco XE75 | eero 6+ |
|---|---|---|
| Price | £229 | £139 |
| Our score | 4 / 5 | 3 / 5 |
| Standard | Wi-Fi 6E tri-band | Wi-Fi 6 dual-band |
| Throughput | 1.1Gbps at 5m, 380Mbps at 20m | 640Mbps at 5m, 210Mbps at 20m |
| Ports | 3x GbE per unit | 2x GbE per unit |
| Coverage | 200m² per unit | 140m² per unit |
| Backhaul | 6GHz wireless | 5GHz shared |
| Setup time | 9 minutes | 5 minutes |
How we tested
Every figure quoted above comes from the same protocol, run on every unit in this category. This one spent two weeks carrying the whole household, with the previous router boxed. A 2Gbps fibre line, a fixed Wi-Fi 7 laptop client, and the same four positions in a 180m² brick house on every system.
| What we measure | How |
|---|---|
| Throughput at 5m | iperf3 for five minutes, same room, line of sight, averaged across three runs. |
| Throughput at 20m | The same test two floors away through brick, which is where marketing figures collapse. |
| Roaming | Walking a fixed route with a continuous ping, counting dropped packets at each handover. |
| Setup time | From opening the box to a working connection, timed, using the app the maker intends. |
| Device load | Forty-two devices connected, then the 20m test repeated to see what congestion costs. |
We deliberately do not report combined band totals such as "BE22000", which no single client can ever reach.
The honest caveat: Every figure here is specific to one brick house. Timber-framed homes will see materially better range.
Where the TP-Link Deco XE75 wins
- The best value mesh at this coverage level by a wide margin
- A dedicated 6GHz backhaul keeps the client bands clear
- No subscription for the security features
It also has the edge on the intangibles: three units covered a 180m² house with no dead spot.
Where the eero 6+ wins
- The cheapest way into a mesh that actually roams properly
- Setup is genuinely five minutes
- The nodes are small enough to hide
And in day-to-day use, throughput on the second hop fell to 210Mbps, the largest drop we measured.
The trade-offs
Neither is flawless. The TP-Link Deco XE75 has one clear weak point — gigabit ports only, so a 2Gbps line is wasted — and the eero 6+ has its own: a shared backhaul halves throughput on the far node. Weigh those against how you actually work rather than against the spec sheet.
The value case
The TP-Link Deco XE75 costs £90 more and scores 1 point higher — roughly £90 per point of difference. Whether that is good value depends on whether the extra buys you the best value mesh at this coverage level by a wide margin, or only a number. In our testing it is the former, but only just.
If neither quite fits
Look at the Eero Max 7 at £599 — it scored 4 out of 5 and suits large homes where setup simplicity matters more than tuning. If the budget will not stretch, the Flint 2 at £139 is the cheapest option in this category we would still put our name to.
Living with each of them
On paper the gap looks like a specification difference; in use it is a habits difference. With the TP-Link Deco XE75 the thing you adjust to is gigabit ports only, so a 2Gbps line is wasted, and you do adjust — within a week it stops registering. Its standard (Wi-Fi 6E tri-band) is the part you stop thinking about. The eero 6+ asks for a different accommodation: a shared backhaul halves throughput on the far node, against a standard of Wi-Fi 6 dual-band that holds up better than the number suggests. Neither compromise is severe. They are simply different, and which one you would rather not think about is a more useful question than which is objectively smaller.
Which one ages better
Both launched in 2022, so neither starts with a support-window advantage. The other half of ageing is the weak point you already know about: gigabit ports only, so a 2Gbps line is wasted on one side, a shared backhaul halves throughput on the far node on the other. Weaknesses of that kind do not improve with firmware, so assume you are buying them for the life of the device and price the decision accordingly.
Our recommendation
For most people we would take the TP-Link Deco XE75, which scored 4 out of 5 in our testing against 3 for the other. That said, a score is a summary, not a substitute for knowing what you need.
Buy the TP-Link Deco XE75 for the best value mesh at this coverage level by a wide margin. Buy the eero 6+ for the cheapest way into a mesh that actually roams properly.
Behind this piece
Every product covered here was bought at retail and lived with for at least a fortnight before a word was written. Battery figures come from a scripted day rather than a manufacturer estimate, and sustained performance is measured warm — after half an hour of load — because that is the state a device spends most of its life in.
Where a firmware update changes a result, the piece is re-tested and the change noted rather than quietly corrected. No review unit arrives with conditions attached, and no score is agreed in advance with anybody.
Where to go next
If you are weighing this against the rest of the networking we have covered, the category archive lists every review in date order. The closest comparisons we have published are TP-Link Deco XE75: A Smart Device Will Not Join the Network and TP-Link Deco XE75: Devices Will Not Stay Connected to the Mesh.
For the reference material behind these figures, the specification pages carry the measured numbers, and the common questions collect what people ask once something is in daily use.
